Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A biological-systems-based analysis using proteomic and metabolic network inference reveals mechanistic insights into hepatic steatosis

  • Natalie N. Atabaki
  • , Daniel E. Coral
  • , Hugo Pomares-Millan
  • , Kieran Smith
  • , Harry H. Behjat
  • , Robert W. Koivula
  • , Andrea Tura
  • , Hamish Miller
  • , Katherine E. Pinnick
  • , Leandro Z. Agudelo
  • , Kristine H. Allin
  • , Andrew A. Brown
  • , Elizaveta Chabanova
  • , Piotr J. Chmura
  • , Ulrik P. Jacobsen
  • , Adem Y. Dawed
  • , Petra J.M. Elders
  • , Juan J. Fernandez-Tajes
  • , Ian M. Forgie
  • , Mark Haid
  • Tue H. Hansen, Angus G. Jones, Tarja Kokkola, Sebastian Kalamajski, Anubha Mahajan, Timothy J. McDonald, Donna McEvoy, Mirthe Muilwijk, Konstantinos D. Tsirigos, Jagadish Vangipurapu, Sabine van Oort, Henrik Vestergaard, Jerzy Adamski, Joline W. Beulens, Søren Brunak, Emmanouil T. Dermitzakis, Giuseppe N. Giordano, Ramneek Gupta, Torben Hansen, Leen M. ‘t Hart, Andrew T. Hattersley, Leanne Hodson, Markku Laakso, Ruth J.F. Loos, Jordi Merino, Mattias Ohlsson, Oluf Pedersen, Martin Ridderstråle, Hartmut Ruetten, Femke Rutters, Jochen M. Schwenk, Jeremy Tomlinson, Mark Walker, Hanieh Yaghootkar, Fredrik Karpe, Mark I. McCarthy, Elizabeth Louise Thomas, Jimmy D. Bell, Andrea Mari, Imre Pavo, Ewan R. Pearson, Ana Viñuela, Paul W. Franks*
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective To delineate organ-specific and systemic drivers of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), we applied integrative causal inference across clinical, imaging, and proteomic domains in individuals with and without type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods Bayesian network analyses and complementary two-sample Mendelian randomization were used to quantify causal pathways linking adipose distribution, glycemia, and insulin dynamics with liver fat in the IMI-DIRECT prospective cohort study. Data included frequently sampled metabolic challenge tests, MRI-derived abdominal and hepatic fat content, serological biomarkers, and Olink plasma proteomics from 331 adults with new-onset T2D and 964 adults without diabetes, with harmonized protocols enabling replication. Results High basal insulin secretion rate (BasalISR), estimated via C-peptide deconvolution, emerged as the primary potential causal driver of liver fat accumulation in both cohorts. BasalISR, a clearance-independent measure of β-cell insulin output distinct from peripheral insulin levels, was independently linked to hepatic steatosis. Visceral adipose tissue exhibited bidirectional associations with liver fat, suggesting a self-reinforcing metabolic loop. Of 446 analyzed proteins, 34 mapped to these metabolic networks (27 in the non-diabetes network, 18 in the T2D network, and 11 shared). Key proteins directly associated with liver fat included GUSB, ALDH1A1, LPL, IGFBP1/2, CTSD, HMOX1, FGF21, AGRP, and ACE2. Sex-stratified analyses identified GUSB in females and LEP in males as the strongest protein predictors of liver fat. Conclusions BasalISR may better capture early β-cell-driven disturbances contributing to MASLD. These findings outline a multifactorial, sex- and disease stage–specific proteo-metabolic architecture of hepatic steatosis and identify potential biomarkers or therapeutic targets.

Original languageEnglish
Article number156552
JournalMetabolism: Clinical and Experimental
Volume178
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Basal insulin secretion
  • Bayesian networks
  • Hepatic steatosis
  • MASLD
  • Mendelian randomization
  • Proteomics
  • Type 2 diabetes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A biological-systems-based analysis using proteomic and metabolic network inference reveals mechanistic insights into hepatic steatosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this