A comparison of five international clinical trial registers with the south african register for access to information and usability

Keyphrases

• South African 100%
• Access to Information 100%
• Clinical Trial Registry 100%
• International Clinical Trials 100%
• Clinical Trials 58%
• Pan-African 23%
• Heuristic Evaluation 17%
• European Union 17%
• Randomized Controlled Trial 11%
• South Africa 11%
• Number of Trials 11%
• Search Engine 11%
• Self-administered Questionnaire 5%
• Health Departments 5%
• Data Extraction 5%
• Multivariate Analysis 5%
• Descriptive Statistics Analysis 5%
• Univariate Analysis 5%
• Search Options 5%
• Online Registers 5%
• Medicines Control Council 5%
• Work Arrangements 5%
• High Profile 5%
• User-friendliness 5%
• Structure Arrangement 5%
• Postgraduate Students 5%
• International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) 5%
• Usability Factors 5%
• Web Search 5%
• Pharmacy Technician 5%
• Regulatory Agencies 5%
• Health Sciences 5%
• Clinical Trial Data 5%
• Overall Information 5%
• South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) 5%
• Data Standardization 5%

Social Sciences

• Clinical Trial 100%
• European Union 11%
• Randomized Controlled Trial 7%
• Legal Procedure 7%
• Search Engine 7%
• Regulatory Authority 7%
• Republic of South Africa 7%
• Administrative Structure 3%
• Descriptive Statistics 3%
• Health Science 3%
• Multivariate Analysis 3%
• User-Friendliness 3%

Nursing and Health Professions

• Clinical Trial 100%
• Search Engine 7%
• World Health Organization 7%
• Republic of South Africa 7%
• Univariate Analysis 3%
• Data Extraction 3%
• Multivariate Analysis 3%