A comparison of five international clinical trial registers with the south african register for access to information and usability

Keyphrases

• South African 100%
• Access to Information 100%
• Clinical Trial Registry 100%
• International Clinical Trials 100%
• Clinical Trials 55%
• Pan-African 22%
• Heuristic Evaluation 16%
• European Union 16%
• Randomized Controlled Trial 11%
• South Africa 11%
• Number of Trials 11%
• Regulatory Agencies 11%
• Search Engine 11%
• Self-administered Questionnaire 5%
• Health Departments 5%
• Data Extraction 5%
• Multivariate Analysis 5%
• Descriptive Statistics Analysis 5%
• Univariate Analysis 5%
• African Health 5%
• Search Options 5%
• Online Registers 5%
• Medicines Control Council 5%
• Work Arrangements 5%
• High Profile 5%
• User-friendliness 5%
• Structure Arrangement 5%
• Health Products 5%
• Postgraduate Students 5%
• International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) 5%
• Usability Factors 5%
• Web Search 5%
• Pharmacy Technician 5%
• Standardized Data 5%
• Health Sciences 5%
• Clinical Trial Data 5%
• Overall Information 5%

Nursing and Health Professions

• South Africa 100%
• World Health Organization 100%
• Search Engine 100%
• Multivariate Analysis 50%
• Univariate Analysis 50%
• Data Extraction 50%