Abstract
In this paper, first, we intend to determine the relationship between the sign of () c0 ∆β y (c0 + 1), for 1 < β < 2, and (∆y)(c0 + 1) > 0, in the case we assume that c0 ∆β y (c0 + 1) is negative. After that, by considering the set Dℓ+1,θ ⊆ Dℓ,θ, which are (subsets) of (1, 2), we will extend our previous result to make the relationship between the sign of () c0 ∆β y (z) and (∆y)(z) > 0 (the monotonicity of y), where c0 ∆β y (z) will be assumed to be negative for each z ∈ NcT0:= {c0, c0 + 1, c0 + 2, …, T} and some T ∈ Nc0:= {c0, c0 + 1, c0 + 2, … }. The last part of this work is devoted to see(the possibility) of information reduction regarding the monotonicity of y despite the non-positivity of c0 ∆β y (z) by means of numerical simulation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 1753 |
| Journal | Mathematics |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 May 2022 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- delta fractional difference
- discrete fractional calculus
- monotonicity
- numerical approximation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Analytical and Numerical Monotonicity Analyses for Discrete Delta Fractional Operators'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver