Consumer willingness to pay for a hypothetical Zika vaccine in Brazil and the implications

Roberto Lúcio Muniz Júnior, Isabella Piassi Godói, Edna Afonso Reis, Marina Morgado Garcia, Augusto Afonso Guerra-Júnior, Brian Godman*, Cristina Mariano Ruas

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)


ABSTRACT : Background: Zika virus is a newly emerging infection, associated with increasingly large outbreaks especially in tropical countries such as Brazil. A future Zika vaccine can contribute to decreasing the number of cases and associated complications. Information about consumers’ willingness to pay (WTP) for a hypothetical Zika vaccine can help price setting discussions in the future in Brazil, starting with the private market. Methods: A cross-sectional study conducted among residents of Minas Gerais, Brazil, regarding their WTP for a hypothetical Zika Vaccine. The mean effective protection was 80%, with the possibility of some local and systemic side- effects. Results: 517 people were interviewed. However, 28 would not be vaccinated even if the vaccine was free. Most of the resultant interviewees (489) were female (58.2%), had completed high school (49.7%), were employed (71.2%), had private health insurance (52.7%), and did not have Zika (96.9%). The median individual maximum WTP for this hypothetical Zika vaccine (one dose) was US$31.34 (BRL100.00). Conclusion: Such discussions regarding WTP can contribute to decision-making about prices once a Zika vaccine becomes available in Brazil alongside other ongoing programs to control the virus.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)473-482
Number of pages10
JournalExpert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 4 Jul 2019


  • Arbovirosis
  • Brazil
  • Zika
  • contingent valuation
  • reimbursement
  • vaccine
  • willingness to pay


Dive into the research topics of 'Consumer willingness to pay for a hypothetical Zika vaccine in Brazil and the implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this