Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Correction: APTIMA mRNA vs. DNA-Based HPV Assays: Analytical Performance Insights from a Resource-Limited South African Setting (International Journal of Molecular Sciences, (2025), 26, 15, (7450), 10.3390/ijms26157450)

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

There was an error in the original publication [1]. The reference Sørbye et al. [21] was incorrectly described in the manuscript as using the APTIMA mRNA assay. A correction has been made to Paragraph 7 of Section 1. Introduction: Previous studies, including a screen-and-treat trial by Sørbye et al. [21], have demonstrated the utility of genotype-specific HPV E6/E7 mRNA testing in improving screening specificity and reducing overtreatment in South African women. A correction has been made to Paragraph 10 of Section 3. Discussion: This observation could obscure age-specific patterns typically observed in general populations [32,33], thus emphasizing the importance of adapting cervical cancer screening strategies, including the selection of appropriate HPV test types and screening thresholds, to local epidemiological data [21]. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Original languageEnglish
Article number974
JournalInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2026

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Correction: APTIMA mRNA vs. DNA-Based HPV Assays: Analytical Performance Insights from a Resource-Limited South African Setting (International Journal of Molecular Sciences, (2025), 26, 15, (7450), 10.3390/ijms26157450)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this