TY - JOUR
T1 - Implementing tobacco dependence treatment during clinical consultations
T2 - A qualitative study of clinicians' experiences, perceptions and behaviours in a South African primary health care setting
AU - Omole, Olufemi B.
AU - Ayo-Yusuf, Olalekan A.
AU - Ngobale, Kabilabe N.W.
N1 - Funding Information:
Special thanks are due to the physicians and nurses who participated in the study, Ms SB Serwalo for conducting and transcribing the interviews, Ms SB Sejake for her support during the data analysis and Prof. KS Okuyemi for his invaluable advice on developing the manuscript. This report is support by grant to OAA from the South African National Research Foundation (Grant # 80843).
PY - 2014/5/6
Y1 - 2014/5/6
N2 - Background: Evidence suggests that healthcare providers (HCPs) in South Africa do not consistently offer tobacco dependence treatment (TDT) during clinical consultations. In order to understand and explain this behaviour in a South African context, we conducted a qualitative exploration of HCPs' experiences, perceptions and behaviours regarding TDT. Methods. Individual qualitative interviews were conducted with physicians and nurses who were purposively selected. Themes were identified from interview transcripts using content analysis. Findings were triangulated and peer-reviewed, and were also verified by the participants. Results: Fifteen physicians and four nurses were interviewed, none of whom used tobacco. These participants perceived TDT as an important task, but could not consistently implement it during clinical consultations due to health systems constraints (time-constraints because of patient-overload, the unavailability of cessation medications and a lack of support for referrals), misperceptions and misconceptions (negative outcome expectations about the effectiveness and feasibility of TDT), socio-cultural barriers (counselling older persons was perceived as challenging) and personal limitations (perceived low self-efficacy, poor knowledge and skills on implementing any evidence-based TDT framework). Patients are therefore selectively screened based on clinical relevance and offered only prescriptive brief advice. Participants recommended several systems changes, including academic detailing of tobacco status, training HCPs and incorporating tobacco cessation medications in the Essential Drug List. Conclusion: The reported selective screening and limited TDT interventions offered by HCPs are related to interactions between health systems constraints, personal limitations, and misperceptions and misconceptions about the effectiveness and feasibility of TDT during clinical consultation. Implementing the recommended systems changes has the potential to improve the implementation of TDT in South African primary health care (PHC).
AB - Background: Evidence suggests that healthcare providers (HCPs) in South Africa do not consistently offer tobacco dependence treatment (TDT) during clinical consultations. In order to understand and explain this behaviour in a South African context, we conducted a qualitative exploration of HCPs' experiences, perceptions and behaviours regarding TDT. Methods. Individual qualitative interviews were conducted with physicians and nurses who were purposively selected. Themes were identified from interview transcripts using content analysis. Findings were triangulated and peer-reviewed, and were also verified by the participants. Results: Fifteen physicians and four nurses were interviewed, none of whom used tobacco. These participants perceived TDT as an important task, but could not consistently implement it during clinical consultations due to health systems constraints (time-constraints because of patient-overload, the unavailability of cessation medications and a lack of support for referrals), misperceptions and misconceptions (negative outcome expectations about the effectiveness and feasibility of TDT), socio-cultural barriers (counselling older persons was perceived as challenging) and personal limitations (perceived low self-efficacy, poor knowledge and skills on implementing any evidence-based TDT framework). Patients are therefore selectively screened based on clinical relevance and offered only prescriptive brief advice. Participants recommended several systems changes, including academic detailing of tobacco status, training HCPs and incorporating tobacco cessation medications in the Essential Drug List. Conclusion: The reported selective screening and limited TDT interventions offered by HCPs are related to interactions between health systems constraints, personal limitations, and misperceptions and misconceptions about the effectiveness and feasibility of TDT during clinical consultation. Implementing the recommended systems changes has the potential to improve the implementation of TDT in South African primary health care (PHC).
KW - Behaviours
KW - Healthcare provider
KW - Primary care
KW - Tobacco dependence treatment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84900542180&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/1471-2296-15-85
DO - 10.1186/1471-2296-15-85
M3 - Article
C2 - 24886595
AN - SCOPUS:84900542180
SN - 1471-2296
VL - 15
JO - BMC Family Practice
JF - BMC Family Practice
IS - 1
M1 - 85
ER -