TY - JOUR
T1 - Policies for biosimilar uptake in Europe
T2 - An overview
AU - Moorkens, Evelien
AU - Vulto, Arnold G.
AU - Huys, Isabelle
AU - Dylst, Pieter
AU - Godman, Brian
AU - Keuerleber, Simon
AU - Claus, Barbara
AU - Dimitrova, Maria
AU - Petrova, Guenka
AU - Sović-Brkičić, Ljiljana
AU - Slabý, Juraj
AU - Šebesta, Robin
AU - Laius, Ott
AU - Karr, Allan
AU - Beck, Morgane
AU - Martikainen, Jaana E.
AU - Selke, Gisbert W.
AU - Spillane, Susan
AU - McCullagh, Laura
AU - Trifirò, Gianluca
AU - Bonanno, Patricia Vella
AU - Mack, Asbjørn
AU - Fogele, Antra
AU - Viksna, Anita
AU - Władysiuk, Magdalena
AU - Mota-Filipe, Helder
AU - Meshkov, Dmitry
AU - Kalaba, Marija
AU - Bedrač, Simona Mencej
AU - Fürst, Jurij
AU - Zara, Corrine
AU - Skiöld, Peter
AU - Magnússon, Einar
AU - Simoens, Steven
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Moorkens et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2017/12
Y1 - 2017/12
N2 - Background Across European countries, differences exist in biosimilar policies, leading to variations in uptake of biosimilars and divergences in savings all over Europe. Objectives The aim of this article is to provide an overview of different initiatives and policies that may influence the uptake of biosimilars in different European countries. Recommendations will be formulated on how to create sustainable uptake. Methods An overview of policies on biosimilars was obtained via a questionnaire, supplemented with relevant articles. Topics were organized in five themes: availability, pricing, reimbursement, demand-side policies, and recommendations to enhance uptake. Results In all countries studied, biological medicines are available. Restrictions are mainly dependent on local organization of the healthcare system. Countries are willing to include biosimilars for reimbursement, but for commercial reasons they are not always marketed. In two thirds of countries, originator and biosimilar products may be subjected to internal reference pricing systems. Few countries have implemented specific incentives targeting physicians. Several countries are implementing pharmacist substitution; however, the scope and rules governing such substitution tend to vary between these countries. Reported educational policies tend to target primarily physicians, whereas fewer initiatives were reported for patients. Recommendations as proposed by the different country experts ranged from the need for information and communication on biosimilars to competitive pricing, more support for switching and guidance on substitution. Conclusions Most countries have put in place specific supply-side policies for promoting access to biosimilars. To supplement these measures, we propose that investments should be made to clearly communicate on biosimilars and educate stakeholders. Especially physicians need to be informed on the entry and use of biosimilars in order to create trust. When physicians are well-informed on the treatment options, further incentives should be offered to prescribe biosimilars. Gainsharing can be used as an incentive to prescribe, dispense or use biosimilars. This approach, in combination with binding quota, may support a sustainable biosimilar market.
AB - Background Across European countries, differences exist in biosimilar policies, leading to variations in uptake of biosimilars and divergences in savings all over Europe. Objectives The aim of this article is to provide an overview of different initiatives and policies that may influence the uptake of biosimilars in different European countries. Recommendations will be formulated on how to create sustainable uptake. Methods An overview of policies on biosimilars was obtained via a questionnaire, supplemented with relevant articles. Topics were organized in five themes: availability, pricing, reimbursement, demand-side policies, and recommendations to enhance uptake. Results In all countries studied, biological medicines are available. Restrictions are mainly dependent on local organization of the healthcare system. Countries are willing to include biosimilars for reimbursement, but for commercial reasons they are not always marketed. In two thirds of countries, originator and biosimilar products may be subjected to internal reference pricing systems. Few countries have implemented specific incentives targeting physicians. Several countries are implementing pharmacist substitution; however, the scope and rules governing such substitution tend to vary between these countries. Reported educational policies tend to target primarily physicians, whereas fewer initiatives were reported for patients. Recommendations as proposed by the different country experts ranged from the need for information and communication on biosimilars to competitive pricing, more support for switching and guidance on substitution. Conclusions Most countries have put in place specific supply-side policies for promoting access to biosimilars. To supplement these measures, we propose that investments should be made to clearly communicate on biosimilars and educate stakeholders. Especially physicians need to be informed on the entry and use of biosimilars in order to create trust. When physicians are well-informed on the treatment options, further incentives should be offered to prescribe biosimilars. Gainsharing can be used as an incentive to prescribe, dispense or use biosimilars. This approach, in combination with binding quota, may support a sustainable biosimilar market.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039798764&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0190147
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0190147
M3 - Review article
C2 - 29284064
AN - SCOPUS:85039798764
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 12
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 12
M1 - e0190147
ER -