Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Secondary efficacy endpoints of the pentavalent rotavirus vaccine against gastroenteritis in sub-Saharan Africa

  • Milagritos D. Tapia*
  • , George Armah
  • , Robert F. Breiman
  • , Michael J. Dallas
  • , Kristen D.C. Lewis
  • , Samba O. Sow
  • , Stephen B. Rivers
  • , Myron M. Levine
  • , Kayla F. Laserson
  • , Daniel R. Feikin
  • , John C. Victor
  • , Max Ciarlet
  • , Kathleen M. Neuzil
  • , A. Duncan Steele
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The efficacy of the pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (PRV), RotaTeq®, was evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter Phase III clinical trial conducted (April 2007-March 2009) in 3 low-income countries in Africa: Ghana, Kenya, and Mali. In total, 5468 infants were randomized 1:1 to receive 3 doses of PRV/placebo at approximately 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age; concomitant administration with routine EPI vaccines, including OPV, was allowed. HIV-infected infants were not excluded. The primary endpoint, vaccine efficacy (VE) against severe-rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE), as measured by Vesikari scoring system (VSS, score ≥11), from ≥14 days following Dose 3 through a follow-up period of nearly 2 years in the combined 3 African countries, and secondary endpoints by total follow-up period have been previously reported. In this study, we report post hoc subgroup analyses on secondary endpoints of public health importance. VE against RVGE of any severity was 49.2% (95%CI: 29.9, 63.5) through the first year of life and 30.5% (95%CI: 16.7, 42.2) through the complete follow-up period. VE against severe-gastroenteritis of any etiology was 21.5% (95%CI: <0, 38.4) through the first year of life and 10.6% (95%CI: <0, 24.9) through the complete follow-up period. Through the complete follow-up period, VE against severe-RVGE caused by (i) vaccine-contained G and P types (G1-G4, P1A[8]), (ii) non-vaccine G types (G8, G9, G10), and (iii) non-vaccine P types (P1B[4], P2A[6]) was 34.0% (95%CI:11.2, 51.2), 81.8% (95%CI:16.5, 98.0) and 40.7% (95%CI:8.4, 62.1), respectively. There was a trend towards higher VE with higher disease severity, although in some cases the numbers were small. In African countries with high under-5 mortality rates, PRV significantly reduced RVGE through nearly 2 years of follow-up; more modest reductions were observed against gastroenteritis of any etiology. PRV provides protection against severe-RVGE caused by diverse rotavirus genotypes, including those not contained in the vaccine.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)A79-A85
JournalVaccine
Volume30
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Apr 2012
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • G genotype
  • Gastroenteritis
  • P genotype
  • Rotavirus
  • Vaccine efficacy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Secondary efficacy endpoints of the pentavalent rotavirus vaccine against gastroenteritis in sub-Saharan Africa'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this